Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Sovereignty: American Indian Civics Project



The American Indian Civics Project website is a great source of information relating to historical events surrounding the formation of American Indian sovereign nations.  A sovereign nation is one in which an absolute legal authority exists who can define independent laws by which people live.  When the Europeans came to North America the Indian nations banded together in an act of sovereignty and formed treaties, alliances, and trade agreements with other nations as a show of defiance and to protect their way of life.   “Each Indian nation consisted of a unique group of people who had a distinct language and a distinct moral, cultural, and religious structure; controlled and regulated a specific geographical area; and possessed governmental powers acknowledged by the tribal people and enforceable by some sort of tribal authority” (American Indian Civics Project).

In response to this, after the Europeans began to settle in North America, many sovereign Indian nations chose to work in collaboration with British colonial leaders to negotiate sovereign partnerships with them.  In doing this the colonists and the various Indian nations accepted the new colonial governments as individual sovereign nations and the Indian nations were accepted by the colonists as their own individual sovereign nations.

This took a negative turn, though, when the colonial and British governments declared that they did not fully acknowledge Native American sovereignty, and they took steps to dissolve their sovereign powers.  These included:
  • “Dispossession.  When the colonists initially bartered for Indian lands claiming that they could make the region more profitable, the Indians refused to sell.  Colonists resorting to dispossessing Indians - simply claiming and moving onto Indian land and refusing to move.
  • Removal.  The colonists asserted that because they could use the land more profitably than tribal nations, Indians would have to remove themselves from their ancestral lands and relocate beyond the boundaries of colonial settlement.  If Indians refused to relocate, the colonists responded that they would be forceably removed.
  • Assimilation.  While the colonists preferred that Indian people remove themselves from their settlements, they were willing to accept some Indian presence within the colonies if they assimilated into their society by accepting Christianity and British culture and traditions.
  • Elimination. If the Indians refused to move, assimilate, or accept colonial governors, colonists had the right to wage a just war(American Indian Civics Project).
These acts resulted in an even higher level of distrust between the natives and the colonists stemming from the unexpected turn-around by the British.  The Native Americans signed sovereignty agreements with the British in a show of faith, but the British backed out and declared that they did not accept the natives as a sovereign people.  It was acts like this, among many others, that have plagued relations between natives and non-natives throughout history. 

American Indian Civics Project. (n.d.). Narrative Historical Overview. American Indian Civics Project: 20th Century Indian Relations with the United States. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://americanindiantah.com/history/nar_colonial_legacy.html

6 comments:

  1. In the past it seems as though the U.S. government did not keep any treaties made with the Native Americans. It is ridiculous how much the government took advantage of these people. All they cared about was profiting off the land and they did not want anyone to stand in their way. They only wanted to accept Native Americans if they became like them. They could not tolerate or respect them as long as they were different. No matter how much land they got it was never good enough. I am surprised by all the new things I am learning about America's history. Thank you for sharing this information. I wonder how the government is attempting to repair it's relationship with Native American's.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You may be surprised that as recently as the last 20 years there was a bill sponsored and approved by John McCain I believe to remove American Indians in SW over resources. America wanted resources and it came at the expense of an American Indian tribe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I read your post I wanted to find more information on legislation surrounding Native American land rights, as well as other types of legislation that challenges their way of life. I found a site called the National Indian Law Library that has a lot of information related to these types of legislation. Here’s the web address: http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/ilb.htm. I learned a lot from this site because I had no idea that there were so many issues that are still up in the air. Why don’t we hear more about these issues? Could it be because the government is concerned that many Americans would vote in favor of the Native Americans?

      Delete
  3. Hi Kelly!

    Thank you for your detailed post! It was really helpful to read the in-depth description of the different situations surrounding the natives sovereignty no longer being recognized. I personally find it saddening that Euro-Americans lacked the integrity to honor the agreements made with the natives. However, I do feel that amends are being attempted with agreements being honored in present day.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciated you detailed post, it provides a detailed summary of sovernity and law and land agreements that were changed. I don't want to say it again, however the selfish greed of mankind to obtain what is best for one person or group, seems to play out once again. The four words really impact in stating what happened to Natives Dispossession, Removal, Assimilation, and Elimination. The order of the four words seems to magnify the roller coaster of emotions and uncertainty that resulted.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I too appreciate your post. There are some people out there who just don't care or want to hear the heartache that all "native" people suffered. It's not easy and the scars of this process are ones that will never heal. We are strong people and continue to move forward. Even in this modern day treaties are broken and thrown to the side just the state politicians can get their pockets full as well. There's a line from the move "Thunderheart" starring Val Kilmer. In the movie Graham Greene whose plays the "reservation cop" says "it's the second coming of the same old cavalry". As insignificant as it may sound it is also true.

    Thunderheart- 00:34:27

    ReplyDelete