I am in support of tribal government and am very happy that
the Native tribes have been able to maintain governmental control over their
tribes all these years. I found the
online resource titled, US Department of Interior Indian Affairs very helpful
in understanding exactly how government is organized between the Native
Americans and the United States, as it is not something that has been easy for
me to grasp. The information obtained
came from the frequently asked question section. As noted on the website, “the relationship
between federally recognized tribes and the United States is one between sovereigns,
i.e., between a government and a government” (U.S. Dept., 2014). It also explains that at the state level, “federally recognized tribes
possess both the right and the authority to regulate activities on their lands
independently from state government control. They can enact and enforce
stricter or more lenient laws and regulations than those of the surrounding or
neighboring state(s) wherein they are located. Yet, tribes frequently
collaborate and cooperate with states through compacts or other agreements on
matters of mutual concern such as environmental protection and law enforcement”
(U.S. Dept., 2014). Although, this does
help to understand the role of the federal, state, and tribal government, after
reading I couldn’t help but wonder or want to read on in the resource as I knew
there must be more to it than this. Where
my confusion has lied is how is it that sometimes the United States government
is allowed to intervene and have their decisions overrule by the federal or
state government? This especially came
to mind after reading Treuer where he writes about the case called Ex
Parte Crow Dog. In this case, “a Lakota
man named Crow Dog killed another Lakota named Spotted Tail in 1881” (Treuer,
2012, p.101). The Tribal leaders made a
decision on how to punish Crow Dog for his wrong doings which included taking responsibility
for the care of Spotted Tail’s widow and in the end even ruled to have him put
to death by hanging. Crow Dog appealed
this decision, hiring a lawyer, and ended in the case being brought to Supreme
Court. In the end he did not have to be
put to death by hanging. Now was it
right for the Tribal leaders to put someone to death for their wrong
doings? Well that’s personal opinion and
I think in this case is very similar to the death penalty that is sometimes
practiced today in our own criminal system.
I personally do not agree with the death penalty so for me I am o.k.
with this decision. However, why is
alright for the United States legal system to make such decisions and not the
Lakota’s? This hit home with me is when
I read, “there was a public outcry in the United States about Indians getting
away with murder; many lawmakers used the sentiment to develop a new policy
approach that would strengthen the U.S. government’s power over Indians on
tribal land” (Treuer, 2012, p.102). I
feel like it is a double standard. After
reading about this case I wanted to learn more about tribal law. What I found after reading the online resource
is that Public Law 820 is helpful in understanding how federal and state government
is allowed to get involved. Granted this
law came into effect in 1953, long after this trial but it is helpful. It states that congress enacted the law “to
grant certain states criminal jurisdiction over American Indians on
reservations and to allow civil litigation that had come under tribal or
federal court jurisdiction to be handled by state courts” (U.S. Dept., 2014). Although it is noted that they do have some
control over civil litigation, they are not able to “regulate matters such as environmental
control, land use, gambling, and licenses on federal Indian reservations” (U.S.
Dept., 2014). This is helpful also as this is how I always understood government control over environment over these types of issues.
References:
Treuer, Anton. (2012).
Everything You Wanted to Know about
Indians But Were Afraid to Ask. Minnesota: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
US Department of Interior Indian Affairs. Last updated 8/1/14. Retrieved
from: http://www.bia.gov/FAQs/index.htm.
Hi Christe!
ReplyDeleteThanks for an interesting post! I reviewed the US Department of Interior Indian Affairs resource for one of my posts as well. In regards to the case in which the U.S. government was able to get involved after Crow Dog got a lawyer- it sound as though it was similar to Amish "community rules". When something wrong is done the Amish have their own way of handling things and choose not seek the help of law enforcement. However, if they were to do so by hiring a lawyer or contacting the police then the wrong doing would likely be handled differently.